ARTAS Robotic Hair Transplant Advancements

ARTAS Robotic Hair Transplant.
ARTAS Robotic Hair Transplant.

I originally wrote this post in 2013 and it was only two paragraphs long. It also had a dancing ARTAS robot video embedded.

At the time, the pioneering ARTAS® hair transplant robot from Restoration Robotics was all the rage. It was FDA-approved for robotic hair transplant surgery in 2011.

I forgot about this subject in recent years till I read a February 2023 article on “lunchtime” robotic hair transplants.

Note that Restoration Robotics undertook an IPO in 2017 (ticker “HAIR”), but then merged with Venus Concept (ticker “VERO”) in 2019. Venus Concept also makes the Neograft® hair restoration system.

Update: A great new video from Dr. Ken Anderson showing ARTAS robot-assisted hair follicle extraction.

ARTAS Graft Excision and Implantation

When I first covered this subject in 2013, I became convinced that automation was the future of follicular unit extraction (FUE) hair transplant procedures. At least when it came to AI- and algorithm-driven faster, more precise and higher quality graft excisions and extractions. And not susceptible to human technician error from fatigue or insufficient training.

Moreover, I wrote another post in 2014 about the future potential for ARTAS recipient site creation and even implantation. This was further confirmed by the highly regarded Dr. Robert Bernstein’s support and testing of this previously unimaginable concept. In 2018, he introduced robotic implantation of follicular unit grafts at the ISHRS 26th World Congress. Key quote:

“With implantation, three of the four aspects of a hair transplant (excision, site creation, implantation) have now been successfully automated. Only graft extraction is left as the remaining step.”

Note that the terminology of “excision” versus “extraction” is confusing for me, especially since I rarely cover hair transplants on this blog, Having said that, even the pros have issues in deciding on whether the “E” in FUE stands for extraction or excision.

Dr. Bernstein is currently using the latest ARTAS® iX Robotic System per his site. On there, he states that this robot automates two key steps in an FUE hair transplant: follicular unit graft harvesting and recipient site creation.

The ARTAS Robotic System allows surgeons to place new hair in the areas of the scalp that are currently thinning, while protecting the existing healthy hair in those regions. It does this via the use of advanced image-guided technology.

Update: In a March 2023 article on robotic hair transplant surgery, Dr. Jon Mendelson says something interesting about his new ARTAS:

“It’s really in the past year or so where the software upgrades, the algorithms, can measure the length of the hair, the depth of the hair, the orientation, and the angle of the hair and can harvest it, extract it and even implant it.”

Robotic Hair Transplant Popularity in 2023

I also wrote another ARTAS related post in 2014 when the company made its 100th robotic system sale. Quite an impressive accomplishment when considering that the ISHRS has around 1,000 surgeon members from around the world. And the more selective IAHRS currently has just 60 members. I would guess that over 300 hair restoration surgeons around the world must be using ARTAS by now?

On Venus Concept’s YouTube channel, they had quite a few ARTAS related videos in 2021, but none in 2022. In contrast, their Twitter and Instagram accounts both covered ARTAS hair transplants in 2023.

Robotic hair transplantation technology still has some issues that prevent its widespread adoption. Some of the decisions on how to use ARTAS must be made by the surgeon on a real-time basis.

Patients must shave their heads before the donor area hair follicles are harvested. This is required in order to overcome problems in those with curly hair. For African hair types that curl below the skin surface, a slightly larger punch needs to be used. If you have grey, white or blonde scalp hair, it must be dyed for the robot to visualize it correctly.

ARTAS graft extraction is also limited to the clearly defined permanent donor zone. In contrast, human surgeons can expand the donor area slightly when suitable. They can even use body hair from the nape of the neck, beard, chest and other regions.

Moreover, many patients refuse to be treated by a robotic system, and many surgeons still remain skeptical about its benefits. And some just prefer not spending a large amount of money on such technology.

So in summary, humans (both surgeons and technicians) are still crucial during a hair transplant procedure in 2023. In fact, experienced hair transplant technicians are in very short supply and can make a great living in this industry.


Unfortunately, the advent of robotics and automation in the hair restoration field does not seem to have reduced the price of a hair transplant. An ARTAS hair transplant will still cost most people at least $10,000 in the US. Many patients would probably become converts if the price of a robotic hair transplant was half that of a regular FUE hair transplant.

4 thoughts on “ARTAS Robotic Hair Transplant Advancements”

  1. Why is the cost of ARTAS hair transplants not cheaper than regular FUE if the labor needed is less? And ARTAS is much faster?

  2. I’m in the dark on all this, but I’m sure I once read somewhere that’s it’s highly recommended to use an actual hair loss surgeon for best results rather than use robo crop? Anyway, whatever works – I’m in. However, if it becomes sentient and starts attacking people – I’m out.

  3. I guess the costs are so high because there are not so many robots in this area and there won’t be in the near future, because in times of hair multiplication possibilities there is not so much motivation to optimise FUE.
    But there are robots for other surgeries and they may also help with hair transplants in the future.

  4. I’m strongly considering an FUE hair transplant (with this ARTAS system) planned alongside Tricopigmentation to maximize the appearance of a natural-looking buzzcut. (Tricopigmentation rather than SMP to adjust for natural changes in my hair as I age: color, texture, etc). I’m tired of waiting around for treatments that may or may not arrive; I’m gonna be 40 later this year and I don’t want to take drugs the rest of my life (I haven’t taken any hairloss drugs before). I’m thinking I’d start with tricopigmentation alone, then if I like it and when I need it redone, work with a skilled surgeon to plan a transplant that would look natural when light shines on the top+frontal parts of my head (since, of course, almost no one has enough donor hair to completely restore their old hair and since tricopigmentation alone can look and feel unnatural in certain light). I’ve never in my entire life had good hair anyway so living with a buzzcut until the end of my days would be ok with me. I’d be curious to know if anyone has yet gone this route and if they’re happy with the outcome.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *