How to Get Cheap Blood Tests

It is a shame that the vast majority of people who take Finasteride or Dutasteride to combat their hair loss never get blood tests to measure their hormone levels pre-medication and post-medication. I am one of those people and wish that I had kept an annual log of my various hormone levels while I have been taking Finasteride 1.25 mg once every two days for a majority of the past ten or so years. There is no guarantee that these medications are always working, and there have been some recent rumors that certain generic versions of Finasteride reduce DHT levels less then non-generic versions.

The main reasons that people do not bother to measure their hormone levels regularly are 1) laziness/inconvenience and 2) the expensive nature of these tests. For example, some years ago I asked my doctor how much a blood test to measure my DHT, estrogen and testosterone levels would cost, and the answer was a combined $500 for the three tests. In addition, you have to pay another $100-200 just to see a doctor so that he/she can then refer you to some expensive affiliated lab for a blood test. Total ripoff.

For peope taking finasteride or dutasteride, the hormones to focus on when getting blood tests are (top 3 = the most pertinent):

  1. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)
  2. Estrogen — various ways of measuring
  3. Testosterone — various ways of measuring
  4. Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
  5. Luteinizing Hormone (LH)

Luckily, blood test prices are no longer that high if you decide to avoid the doctor and the hospital lab and instead go to private walk-in facilities or purchase kits that you mail back with your blood drawn at home. Some of the below listed places might not have locations in your city, and some might not be reviewed online as frequently as you desire, but it is still worth checking  them out. Self-diagnosis and taking healthcare into your own hands is not the future of medicine. It is the present of medicine.

If you have any kind of esoteric medical problem, your 1,000 plus hours of internet research and internet forum participation oftentimes makes you far more of an expert in that particular condition than some doctor who has to focus on keeping up with developments in dozens or even hundreds of medical conditions.

LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics — A Duopoly, but How Much Longer?

In the US, by far the two largest companies offering diagnostic lab services are LabCorp (LH) and Quest Diagnostics (DGX). Typically, when your doctor sends you to get a lab test at a local facility, your results are then sent in to one of the above two companies. However, there are now much cheaper options if you avoid the doctor from the get go (see next section). Moreover, Elizabeth Holmes and her company Theranos will change the whole game entirely if things go as planned (see second section below).

Walk-In Clinics Where You Can Get Low-Cost Blood Tests

Below are some examples of clinics in the US that offer blood tests that are significantly cheaper than at regular labs. Unfortunately, most of the below places still end up using the services of LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics. However, at least its a lot cheaper this way than going via your doctor’s referral. Some of the below have special offers every month.

LifeExtension –> DHT test = $50

Walkinlab –> DHT test = $60

Directlabs –> DHT = $169

Anylabtestnow –> DHT = $309 in my city!

Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos: A Revolution in Blood Testing

A few months before I wrote about BioViva’s Elizabeth (Liz) Parrrish, I had been contemplating writing about Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos fame, but never got to it till today (although I did cover Theranos as part of several monthly “Brief Items of Interest” posts). Ms. Holmes founded Theranos in 2003 at the age of 19. The company has developed a way to extract just a few drops of your blood from your finger via pinpricks and then conduct over 240 blood tests (and counting) on those few blood drops.

Moreover, via a partnership Theranos has now started offering these tests at Walgreens’ Wellness Centers in select parts of the US, and will expand nationwide and then internationally in the near future. These tests will generally costs a fraction of what they cost at the labs I discussed earlier. Moreover, since Walgreens is omnipresent in the US, we are not far from a time when every single one of us can get a blood test for cheap with just some pin pricks right at our next door Walgreens. This will represent a medical revolution.

The Battle of the Liz’s

Ms. Holmes has garnered 1,000s of times more publicity and media coverage in the US compared to Ms. Parrish, although the former has been in the news for a significantly longer time than the latter. Ms. Holmes has managed to get numerous ex-politicians on her company (Theranos)’s board of directors, giving her influence that Ms. Parrish can only dream about. The most famous of these ex-politicians is Henry Kissinger. Interestingly, while Ms. Parrish is a vegetarian, Ms. Holmes is a vegan.

While Ms. Parrish has a bachelor’s degree related to Biology (and she has been criticized for not having any further advanced degree), Ms. Holmes is a Stanford University dropout from the Chemical Engineering program. Ms. Holmes has become the world’s youngest self-made female billionaire (current net worth estimated at $4.6 billion), while Ms. Parrish is probably not even a millionaire yet. Both are female CEOs, a rarity. Both are very well spoken and photogenic, the latter of which is unfortunately often a bit too important for success in the western world.

In the long run, what Ms. Parrish is doing is far more important than what Ms. Holmes is doing, but the only problem is that there is a decent chance that Ms. Parrish’s gene therapy procedures might not work, or even worse, could be banned if someone dies during the initial human experiments. Especially if other semi-medically knowledgeable qualified professionals start recklessly following Ms. Parrish’s example with dangerous untested therapies.

Nevertheless, it is absolutely wonderful that Ms. Parrish could likely accelerate the start of an era in which humans taking their healthcare and their bodies into their own hands and ignore the government (or find ways to bypass the government — e.g., get things done in Colombia or Congo or preferably Japan in the near future).

On the other hand, what Ms. Holmes is doing is far more likely to work and has in fact already been proven to pass government requirements in several cases. Due to the company’s stealth mode operations, things are not entirely clear as yet, but my intuition tells me that the company’s proprietary technology works.

Theranos: A Week of Bad Publicity

The biggest problem with Theranos has been that it is extremely secretive as to how its technology works. Since the company is currently privately held, it has been able to largely get away with this — until this week when the Wall Street Journal published a critical article on Theranos, accusing the company of not using its technology for many of the tests, as well as implying a number of other issues with the company. Elizabeth Holmes was not pleased with this, and strongly defended her company yesterday. Virtually all major media has been covering this story, including the New York Times.

My feeling is that Theranos will get through these difficulties. It already has one blood test (Herpes Simplex) cleared by the FDA, and is hoping to get 120 others approved in the near future.

Unfortunately, while Theranos currently offers Estrogen and Testosterone blood tests, it offers no DHT blood tests.

PRP Activation with Calcium Gluconate

PRP Activation with Calcium Gluconate

— Dr. John Cole made an interesting update to his “looking for PRP volunteers” thread (since removed) on the Bald Truth Forums. He is trying out the following PRP activation formulations (he seems to prefer calcium gluconate over calcium chloride):

“1. PRP plus calcium gluconate (CG) Vs. PRP plus CG plus recothrombin
2. PRP plus calcium gluconate (CG) Vs. PRP plus CG plus autologous thrombin
3. PRP plus calcium gluconate (CG) Vs. PRP plus CG plus ACell
4. PRP plus calcium gluconate (CG) Vs. PRP plus CG plus AmnioFX
5. PRP plus calcium gluconate (CG) AmnioFX plus ACell Vs. PRP plus CG plus AmnioFX
6. PRP plus calcium gluconate (CG) Vs. Ultrasound cell lysis to release growth factors of PRP plus CG
7. PRP plus calcium gluconate (CG) Vs. PRP plus CG plus dalteparin plus protamine microparticles.”

— While we are talking about the details of PRP, on October 10 Dr. Jerry Cooley posted the following (link no longer working) on the Hair Restoration Network forums:

“About PRP, that’s a great question. Actually, there a lot of different ways to ‘do’ PRP. Adding ACell is just one variable. Some of these other variables are: the device used to centrifuge the blood, the concentration of platelets achieved, the total volume injected, the size of the syringe and needle used to do the injecting, the level in the scalp it is injected, whether the PRP is ‘activated’, the use of microneedling, etc. All of these can affect the result in my opinion.”

— Although I discussed PRP a lot in this post, I still think that its a gamble when it comes to regrowing lost hair. If you do go for this procedure, it is probably worth contacting Dr. Joseph Greco first and then contacting other doctors for a second and third opinion. [Update: Dr. Greco sent me some feedback that I have pasted in the comments to this blog post].

— Prolific hair loss forum participant “Hellouser” is planning to attend the 9th World Congress for Hair Research in Miami from November 18-21, 2015. I suspect that this Congress will be the best one yet. Last year I asked blog readers to raise funds for “Desmond” from Australia to go to the 8th World Congress for Hair Research in South Korea, and this year I am asking people to help raise funds for “Hellouser” from Canada to attend this Congress in the US. Desmond’s videos from last year’s conference were excellent and an absolute must watch. I hope “Hellouser” also manages to film many of the most anticipated presentations this year. Please see his gofundme page for more.

— I covered Samumed in a detailed post last year. It seems like the company updated its clinical trials page last month and might still be recruiting volunteers (although one forum member said they stopped after getting too many calls). I called their Ohio testing location and left a voicemail on 10/16/15 and will update this section if they call me back. Update: Ohio location staff called me back on 10/19/15 and are still accepting volunteers this week.

Perhaps of more significance, Samumed is a Silver level sponsor of the earlier mentioned upcoming 9th World Congress for Hair Research. They are clearly not going away, and their Wnt pathway activation strategy is entirely different from what other companies such as Allergan, Histogen and Replicel are doing.

— An interesting new study tiled “The In-Vitro Development of Polarized Hair Bearing Skin” using LGR6+ epithelial stem cells. A bit too technical for me to analyze in detail in this brief updates post.

And now on to medical items of interest:

Deleting genes could bolster lifespan by 60 years. Only done in yeast cells as of now, but perhaps Liz Parrish can help speed this up in humans too?

George Church and colleagues do it yet again. They modify 62 genes in pigs used the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology. Humanity is a giant step closer to the day when organs can be harvested from pigs and implanted into humans without fear of rejection.

— If organ donations from pigs take too long to become a reality, there is always the possibility of ever improving artificial organs. The third ever patient to be fitted with an artificial Carmat heart is doing well six months post transplant. He is 73 years old. The first such patient died 2.5 months after getting an artificial heart and the second such patient died 9 months after getting an artificial heart  due to a motor control malfunction.

— I was unaware that earlier this year US based Alcor cryogenically preserved its youngest ever patient: a two-year old Thai child (just her brain). Now the BBC has published a very good article with video covering the family. Both parents are highly educated medical scientists and really believe that we are not too far from when science can bring back the dead. So long as they or their brains have been frozen immediately upon death.

I am very creeped out by this, but at the same time fascinated. The parents seem like very reasonable and compassionate human beings. Also see last month’s NY Times front page article on Kim Suozzi’s brain preservation via cryonics.

An interesting side note: I met this lady at a conference in 2008 and she told me that she was involved in the freezing of baseball legend Ted Williams at Alcor in 2002. She told me that even at the age of 83, his legs were extremely muscular!

— A good article on Japan’s push to lead the world in stem cell research, including fast tracking clinical trials. We in the hair loss world know all about this and are hoping that many western companies take advantage of these favorable laws and conduct their trials in Japan.

— DARPA seems to treat bodies with light, electricity, sound and magnets. Make sure to read my posts on electricity and hair growth and sound and hair growth.