Dr. Coen Gho — The Original Hair Regenerator (Maybe)

Ever since I first became interested in hair loss research and hair biology 10-15 years ago and started following online hair loss forum discussions, around a dozen or so events and/or persons have stood out from the rest in terms of the intense frenetic online coverage that they received.  I have probably mentioned all of these on this blog by now except for one — Dr. Coen Gho.

Around 5 years ago, Dr. Gho became the most talked about hair transplant surgeon on hair loss forums (replacing FUE pioneer Dr. Ray Woods in popularity).  Dr. Gho claimed that he could extract donor hair from the back of the scalp, implant it in the frontal or crown region recipient site, and yet the donor region would still regrow all its original hair while the recipient site would also grow the new (transplanted donor) hair as is expected in all hair transplants.   i.e., his method would never lead to donor hair depletion at the back of the scalp (the biggest drawback of hair transplants) and, in essence, this was a cure for hair loss as you could keep getting hair transplants and not deplete donor hair.  Perhaps this strategy only works 2 or 3 times and I missed that in case Dr. Gho ever said so.  However, even if it worked only twice, such donor hair multiplication or regeneration would essentially be a cure for hair loss for those at Norwood Scale 2 to 5 or so.

Dr. Gho was already reasonably well known online even 10-15 years ago, but two things helped him become truly renowned starting around 2010:

  1. His Netherlands based company’s focus on documenting procedures via well made videos, including on local or internet celebrities (e.g., see here and here and here).
  2. His appearance on The Bald Truth radio show.

Dr. Gho can be cocky at times, with the best example being his insult (“If he had opted for our technique, Wayne would have avoided looking like Quasimodo”) of Wayne Rooney’s pretty decent hair transplant.

Dr. Gho’s Hair Stem Cell TransplantationTM (HST) Technique

Dr. Gho’s partial longitudinal follicular unit transplantation (PL-FUT)” Hair Stem Cell TransplantationTM (HST) technique details are presented here and here.  It does make logical sense to me that some leftover stem cells regenerate donor hair while the transplanted/ moved stem cells also grow hair in the previously barren recipient area.  Dr. Gho has also had his work published in some prestigious journals (e.g., see here and here and here).

My Thoughts

I titled this post as Dr. Gho being the original hair regenerator (maybe) because ever since Dr. Gho came on the scene, a number of other hair transplant surgeons have claimed to be able to do the same.   However, most of these surgeons have little evidence to support their claims or are just in the initial research and experimentation phase of their work.  This is not to say that Dr. Gho’s results are as revolutionary as one would have expected after all the great publicity he has received and after the initial excitement generated from his journal publications. I have serious doubts about how successful his regeneration/hair multiplication is (hence my use of the word “maybe” in the title of this post).

Online hair loss forum posts have largely been skeptical about Dr. Gho’s ability to regenerate hair via his “partial longitudinal follicular unit transplantation (PL-FUT)” Hair Stem Cell TransplantationTM technique.  Some people think that even if the technique works, in all likelihood the donor hair and the recipient hair will both be thinner than normal (one of the studies from Dr. Gho that I linked to earlier concludes that the hair in both sites is of the same original thickness and caliber).  A number of hair transplant surgeons such as Dr. Ray Woods and Dr. William Rassman have also expressed serious doubt about Dr. Gho’s technique.  Dr. Woods does suggest that he and others have seen a 5 percent regeneration of transected hair follicles, and this is a fascinating phenomenon.  Why can’t scientists/surgeons do better than 5 percent? The HASCI exposed website is worth a read in its entirety.

Irrespective of the probability of HST regenerating donor hair or not, most of Dr. Gho’s patients who have posted online seem to like their hair transplant results, so thankfully he at the very least seems to be a good hair transplant surgeon.

6 thoughts on “Dr. Coen Gho — The Original Hair Regenerator (Maybe)”

  1. But, at the end, his technique does work or not? It should be easy to check isn it? I dont understand how this things can not ve proveed in a scienyistic manner !!!!!!

  2. Hair Stem Cell Transplantation can be proved the best treatment for hair baldness if it gets done by a highly proficient surgeon. As stated above that many doctors claimed about their proficiency in HST but only Dr. Gho was able to prove it

  3. Admin,

    Hi, I’m follow to a post from last year about the hasson & wong topical fin. Specifically “… drug is unlikely to be going systemic via cutaneous permeation. We are currently performing tests using Franz diffusion cells with the The University of Milan to get more data.”

    Since those tests were done a year ago, were you able to find out the results?

    1. IQ, Please find the post (I had two on that subject) and post the comment there. I did not approve your first comment from today, and will delete this one too once you post it under the correct blog post. That way others reading those older posts also get to know the answer to your important question. Thanks.

  4. Very informative and detailed. To be honest, our perspective is that hair transplant procedures will never be a realistic and complete “cure” for androgenetic alopecia. This would encompass two efforts: shrunk hair follicles reprogramming, and new hair follicles generation among them, to completely control density and hair features. This is not to say that work by Dr. Gho and other surgeons is useless, such new technologies are naturally made up of contingency plans and different approaches.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *